Beretta 92X

Our Review Score

4

Public Score

0 out of 5

Our Overall Scores

2.83
/5

― Value

5
/5

― Reliability

4.17
/5

― Accuracy

4
/5

― Trigger

4.33
/5

― Ergonomics

3.67
/5

― Recoil

-
/5

― Concealment

Sitting just under the $1,000 threshold are two pistols from juggernaut companies with long histories of producing top-shelf firearms for civilian, military and law enforcement use. The first is the full-sized Beretta 92X ($899), an evolutionary upgrade to the 92 series. The version we received had the decocker-only function, which I prefer instead of fumbling with a slide-mounted safety.

A traditional DA/SA pistol, the 92X incorporates a straight backstrap and the company’s slimmer Vertec-style grip panels for better ergonomics and easier handling, especially for shooters with smaller hands. For those who prefer the old-school feel, a wraparound grip is shipped with the 92X as well.

Advertisement — Continue Reading Below

The 92X closely resembles Beretta’s M9A3 design, which itself was an evolutionary update with dovetailed sights, a Picatinny rail, an oversized mag release, checkered rather than serrated straps and an updated frame. The main difference between the two is the lack of a threaded barrel on the 92X, standard three-dot sights (with a high-visibility orange dot up front) and all-black appearance. The M9A3 sports a Flat Dark Earth finish. Everything else is what you already know and love about the Beretta 92 series, from the sleek lines to the buttery-smooth slide action and that outstanding DA trigger. Out of the box, the DA trigger pull weighed 7.25 pounds on average while the SA pull came in at just 3.25 pounds. Even better, the silky trigger travel was exceptionally clean and crisp—just one of the reasons why the platform has so many ardent fans.

Starting alphabetically, the Beretta 92X had a great grip angle for faster targeting. The trigger was excellent for a duty or service pistol. The decocker was much appreciated over a slide-mounted safety, and everyone seemed to like the classic styling, smooth action and accuracy. On the other hand, the rear sight notched seemed a bit too large, the magazine lips had sharp angles and were difficult to load, and the grip screws walked out while shooting.

Our Overall Scores

2.83
/5

― Value

5
/5

― Reliability

4.17
/5

― Accuracy

4
/5

― Trigger

4.33
/5

― Ergonomics

3.67
/5

― Recoil

-
/5

― Concealment

Public Reviews (0)

This product has no reviews yet, be the first to change that!

Review This Product

All reviews are screened and approved by a human for fairness and accuracy.

Latest Reviews

Related Reviews

GLOCK 17 Gen6

Glocks have always been the Toyota Corollas of the gun world: reliable and durable, but rarely thrilling. With the Gen 6, however, Glock has...

Tisas USA 1911A1 US ARMY

SDS Imports put in the time and effort with Turkish pistol maker Tisas to develop a whole line of very well made M1911 platforms...

The Shield X

The Shield X feels less like an update and more like the Shield finally finished. It keeps the thin, easy-to-carry profile that made the...